Red plastic cups, half empty bottles of beer, week-old pizza boxes and a familiar locker room scent. From the iconic letters to the signature names, sororities and fraternities have been around as far back as the 1700s.
Much like university itself, “Greek life” is an institution. Although many fraternity brothers and sorority sisters are eager to label themselves as a ‘family’ or an ‘entity,’ the similarities between your average Greek organization and a cult are few and far between, outside of their reputations.
With American Pie serving as more reminiscent of university life than your token physics theory, it’s not a surprise sororities and fraternities have long been associated with excessive sex, partying, drinking and hazing (being forced or threatened to perform humiliating and often painful tasks in order to be initiated).
Hazing has long been used an excuse for many to hold on to stereotypical perspectives of the Greek way of life. Elements of this interrogative method and the intentions behind it are not entirely different from the college scare tactic, which only adds to the exclusivity of fraternities and sororities around the world – many of which adhere to an inherent don’t ask, don’t tell policy.
“Hazing was originally meant to hurt and embarrass you, and through that, create a stronger bond. There are better ways,” shared Nicky Clark, VP Recruitment of UTSC sorority, Chi Sigma Xi.
“We had one girl who wanted to join, but she was looking for that American stereotype,” added fellow member, Sonya Nova-San. “She said, ‘You don’t even haze a little bit? You don’t party?’ And because we have a strict anti-hazing policy, she dropped out of pledging. She wanted to be hazed!”
Ron Leung, president of St. George’s (all University of Toronto houses are tri-campus) Sigma Chi fraternity, holds a similar stance on hazing. “Zero tolerance. We don’t do it.” However, he later alluded to “rituals” and “tasks” members have the responsibility of accomplishing, common euphemisms for well-disguised hazing.
University of Alberta’s Delta Kappa Epsilon chapter was suspended earlier this year due to hazing. The allegation suggested pledges were forced to sit in a wooden box and eat their own vomit. This past summer, Cornell fraternity Sigma Alpha Epsilon was slapped with a $25 million lawsuit after George Desdunes, a first-year student, died during a hazing ritual in which he was bound and given excess food and alcohol.
But it’s the most prominent Scarborough chapters which have truly managed to steer clear of college drama. Still largely in their infancy, both Chi Sigma Xi and Xi Alpha Pi (XAP) have not only developed their own strict no-hazing policies, but instead revolve around multiculturalism, contrary to popular stereotypes about sororities and fraternities.
Students in both houses are of diverse ethnicity and from a range of academic programs. Xi Alpha Pi, founded in 2008, is the first ever multicultural fraternity solely based in Canada.
“We define ourselves as a multicultural fraternity simply on the basis of accepting and appreciating the various values, ideologies and ideas that all of our respective cultures bring forth into the Brotherhood,” shared Rupom Rahman, a brother of the fraternity. “Besides, seeing as UTSC is considered to be among the world’s most multicultural university campuses, it would be a shame if we did not cater to that affinity.”
But despite their good intentions, the Chi Sigma Xi girls have still found themselves targets of stereotyping.
“When you walk by, people just assume you’re part of this awful organization, it’s terrible,” explained Nova-San. “They say, ‘That girl’s in a sorority, she’s a slut. Like what do you do, sleep around?’”
The boys seemingly have found it easier.
“We don’t call ourselves a ‘frat’, or refer to each other as ‘bro’s’ — we’re brothers. We’re men coming together to enlighten other people. We’re not childish boys who come together to party, do drugs and get drunk. That’s not our intent, that’s not our goal,” said Adil Kanji, XAP’s PR manager.
Sure, along with this and their refusal to disclose their roster in order to keep their “entity” intact, they may sound more like a disturbingly close-knit group of ethical Christmas carolers. But if it’s a common vision they’re going for, they’ve got it.
As far as funding goes, because many sororities and fraternities do discriminate, the University of Toronto does not allocate funding to them.
Chi Sigma Xi is working towards being recognized by the National Panhellenic Council (NPC), an organization that represents over millions of women and chapters in the U.S. and Canada. Currently, both houses fund their own operations, foregoing ‘dues’ — unlike Sigma Chi — a monthly membership fee which otherwise goes toward house maintenance and events.
While it may seem like pointing the finger, the houses, which often garner more flak for partying or drinking, are the St. George fraternities.
Earlier this year, Zeta Psi, one of the oldest fraternities in Toronto, was littered with public drunkeness, and it wasn’t the first time. Beta Theta Pi, in particular, has been visited by the police roughly 100 times between 1998 and 2008, due to noise complaints, fighting and sexual assault.
Nevertheless, academics and philanthropy remain highly valued. Most houses include study halls and group study sessions. Charity-wise, the Scarborough houses are supporters of the White Ribbon Campaign against women’s violence. Last year, Xi Alpha Pi teamed up with other UTSC student organizations and came in third place countrywide for participating with One Match, a donor bank for stem cell research.
If there are any differences between the Scarborough houses and their St. George counterparts, it’s the emphasis on multiculturalism and no hazing.
Several St. George houses have been cited for discrimination and indecency in the past. In fact, many I reached out to responded with a refusal to be involved, a several month long approval process for my journalistic intent (see: Pi Beta Phi) or no response at all. While they may be afraid of having their image tainted further, they’re only reinforcing the elitist exclusivity they like to think they have no part of.
However, Sigma Chi’s Leung did assert that St. George sororities and fraternities are more diverse than one would think.
“There are some girls you’d never expect to be sorority girls, and guys you’d never expect to be frat guys,” he said. “There’s never that one personality. We’re very accepting, it’s very diverse. Look at each house; it’s almost like the United Nations!”
So while the days of the cheerleader and the jock may never be numbered, UTSC may just be the exception to the rule.
For a campus long billed as having more of a high school than a university atmosphere, that is one stereotype we can cross off the list — all thanks to the students who took the initiative to create their own Greek community at an otherwise letter-less campus.
This is the kind of motivation that true sisterhood or brotherhood thrives on.





Dear Editor,
Although I can sympathize with your views on what you assume to be the “American-styled” fraternities and sororities that currently exist at UofT, if you want an inside story, you have to be on the inside in order to tell it.
It is not a matter of elite-ism or exclusion. You have explained that UTSC has a newly founded “sorority” that goes against the stereotype. What I would like to know is, what do you know about sisterhood and brotherhood? I won’t hide the speculations you’ve seen thrown by some members of the greek society, but what I would like you to see is that as you are rambling on about how these newly founded organizations go against the stereotype, you haven’t realized that’s exactly what the already existing groups are trying to do.
Within my four year of being a part of the Greek Community(that is based at St. George) there were many lessons I have learned that the university could never have taught me. One of them being open-minded and well-informed.
I can see how you’ve misinterpreted single cases of naive university student actions and assume this is something everyone in the group pursues.
Please, before you speak of diversity and multiculturalism and how encompassing these new organizations are, realize that these groups still call themselves sororities and fraternities. Why? Why would you want to label yourself something you are trying to distance yourself from? Why not call yourself a gentleman’s club or lady’s gathering? Because everyone wants acceptance.
Congratulations to the young women and men who have found comfort within the walls of their newly founded brotherhood or sisterhood. Please do remember that history repeats itself, and avoid it at all cost. Or else, one day, someone might write a lovely article about you reinstating every prejudice remark you are working so hard to disprove.
Regards,
Greek Life
Hi Greek Life, thanks for the comment!
I think it’s been made clear in my article that I certainly was not on the “inside”, and of course, I can’t give anyone the perfect perspective if I haven’t been inside that life, living it myself, but I think it’s clear that was not my assumption. My intention is to share my thoughts from talking to those who are involved. Many of them are referenced, and speaking to them did provide an incredible look into what Greek life is like – maybe not a perfect look, but close enough for a person who is not a part of that world to try and understand more than they did before.
I’m sure many of the current houses out there are indeed attempting to fight the stereotype, as I chronicled several, but not only could I have spoken to everyone, many refused to speak to me and share their thoughts. My focus was on the Scarborough houses, a couple of which I did speak to. From them, I learned they are actively fighting the stereotype and succeeding. Based on some of the research I did, I found many of the St. George frats and sororities—while they certainly may be attempting to fight the stereotype, as you say—have still only been reinstating it, with noise complaints, public drinking, and partying.
I absolutely went into this with an open mind, and was as well-informed as I could be at the point of writing this article—which, I believe, was informed enough to develop my own opinion.
I did not at any point suggest or say that “this is something everyone in the group pursues”. I’m not clear if you’re referring to all houses in general, or specifically St. George ones, but if it is the latter, I stated, “…the houses, which often garner more flak for partying or drinking, are the St. George fraternities”, and “Several St. George houses have been cited for discrimination and indecency in the past.” You’ve come to this incredibly defensive conclusion on your own, and I’m curious as to why. Certainly, several St. George houses are not representative of them all. However, like it or not, they do affect each other’s reputations, which only further defines the stereotype, something some choose to actively fight against.
I also believe you contradicted yourself, saying, “…these groups still call themselves sororities and fraternities. Why? Why would you want to label yourself something you are trying to distance yourself from?” Are you suggesting that sororities and fraternities are, in fact, about hazing and excessive drinking/partying? My entire point here is that this is not the case, and they are helping to reaffirm what a fraternity and sorority are really about—sisterhood and brotherhood. I would think, as a brother or sister yourself, you would share that opinion.
Sadaf
This article is too prejudicial against Sororities and Fraternities at U of T, specially towards Sigma Chi and Pi Beta Phi.
I don’t even know where to start. First, it lacks objectivity. You might as well call the article “Chi Sigma Xi and Xi Alpha Pi are the greatest!!!”
Then there’s the repeated reference of “St George Greeks” and the “UTSC GREEKS”. Last time I checked, UTSG, UTM and UTSC are all part of one university. Most, if not all, of the Greek Lettered Orgs. at U of T recruit from all three campuses. They just happen to be centered around UTSG since it is the main campus.
As far as I know, Alpha Phi Alpha, FIJI, Lambda Phi Epsilon, DEKE, Sigma Chi, et al, they all refer to their chapters as “University of Toronto” not “UTSG/UTM/UTSC”. Oh and yea, these Fraternities and Sororities at U of T actually have a council: the FSC. I wonder if you are even aware of that.
How is your article prejudicial you may ask? Well, you claim that you did your research about Greek Life at U of T yet all you came up with are the negatives and the infractions.
You imply that Pi Beta Phi “have been cited for discrimination and indecency in the past” when you include right after that statement “(see Pi Beta Phi)” while at the same time epitomizing them as the notorious offender of not providing you an audience for interview. And then also claim that they didn’t answer to your call because they are “afraid of having their image tainted further”. Oh and then you lay judgement on them by saying “they’re only reinforcing the elitist exclusivity they like to think they have no part of.” Wait a second, I thought this article is about clarifying misconceptions about greek life!? Not making them look bad?!
Also, your months long quest for an interview only yielded in Pi Beta Phi’s refusal? You didn’t name any other sororities. Did they refuse you too? You didn’t write about them. Did you get answered by them? Again, you didn’t post any of it. There’s several of them. Tri Delts, Alpha Phi, AOPi, etc.
My point is, if you are going to be objective, don’t name one and made that one look bad. It is very unprofessional for a writer. It’s like a cheapshot at them.
When you did get an interview (Sigma Chi President), you conveniently left out a huge chunk of the interview. Am I really to assume that all you got from Ron Leung when you interviewed him is that greek orgs are diverse like the UN and that he made comments that “alluded to “rituals” and “tasks” members have the responsibility of accomplishing, common euphemisms for well-disguised hazing.”????? That’s it?! Ron strikes me as an intelligent guy. You didn’t bother asking about what else Sigma Chi has to offer? Or you did but you just decided not to include it in your article.
Ok the Sigma Chi president was kind enough to give you an interview but, does this not sound like a cheapshot on Sigma Chi?
“Currently, both (XAP & CSX)fund their own operations, foregoing ‘dues’ — unlike Sigma Chi — a monthly membership fee which otherwise goes toward house maintenance and events.”
How do you expect readers to read that?
“lol !! ohhh these two don’t charge! Unlike Sigma Chi! ooooh!”
You mentioned Dekes from Alberta being suspended. How is that any relevany for Greeks at U of T? THEY’RE NOT EVEN THE U OF T CHAPTER! Are you implying that because there are bad apples from Alberta the ones from Toronto are bad too?
Has it ever occurred to you that the organizations that have bad reputations are putting the effort to clean that up? And that you are undermining their efforts by releasing further bad publicity for them? Do you really think you are helping Greek Life at U of T with your article?
You twitted the following (i saw from the side bar):
“utscUNDERGROUND Seeing through the haze: clarifying misconceptions about #UofT sororities and fraternities! http://t.co/D1kl7hXX #UTSC #SororityLife”
It’s the other way around. You didn’t clarify any misconceptions. You’ve made it worse. You didn’t try to bring up positive aspects of these groups and instead made them sound more negative. That’s what I mean by this article being prejudicial. You’re gonna say “the facts are there and I’m only pointing it out”. The problem is you only told half of the story about the Greeks at U of T. The bad side of it.
In your response to Greek Life, you said about Greek Orgs at U of T, “while they certainly may be attempting to fight the stereotype, as you say—have still only been reinstating it, with noise complaints, public drinking, and partying. ”
You are once again implying that this is all what they represent. You haven’t given them credit for their contributions to the community. I’m not going to outline them here for you. You don’t deserve to know here. You need to do better research.
I visited three Fraternity websites briefly and found recent events where they contribute to the community:
Sigma Chi recently had their Derby Day philantrophy event http://www.sigmachitoronto.com/
Delta Upsilon had their Doctor’s Without Borders info session night. http://www.dutoronto.com/home
Lambdas raised some money for Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Light the Night Walk http://tolambdas.com/events.html
These are just three of them. And I am inclined to think the others do their part too. Now please tell me you actually did research. Because to me, it seems these guys are not one dimensional party animals that you insist they are. They do try to contribute to society.
Look there’s nothing wrong with you bigging up these new UTSC houses. That’s fine. More power to them if they’re doing good things. But you’re doing it at the expense of the other groups.
I’d like to reiterate Greek Life’s last sentences as they do echo my sentiments: “Please do remember that history repeats itself, and avoid it at all cost. Or else, one day, someone might write a lovely article about you reinstating every prejudice remark you are working so hard to disprove.”
…
As an incoming first year student I didn’t even know that there was a sorority at UTSC. There presence is not seen around the school or on social media, whereas, sororities at St.George do charitable work that involves the school and adds to school spirit. And being recruited by a St. George sorority, I can assure you that there is no hazing involved!
I have a question to the writer did she ever go to any of the fraternities and sororities downtown? They are all very multicultural and have people from all three campuses and programs.
In fact there are a lot of UTSC students there as well, maybe at the end of the day those students want more (sisterhood, bonding, life long friendship) than what the sorority at UTSC offers (multiculturalism-really?).
Hi there,
The writer repeatedly tried to get in touch with St. George sororities — as the article indicates, most refused to speak to her. The article is absolutely not an attack on sororities and fraternities at St. George; they certainly are multicultural and diverse, but there is no denying that some of them have a bad rep that taints the image of other sororities/fraternities. And by the way, who’s to say that sororities at UTSC do not offer sisterhood, bonding or life long friendship? Just a thought.
We welcome your comments!
UG
Hi,
I don’t think the comments were implying saying the article is attacking greek life. The comments were saying how misinformed the writer was and her inability to do sufficient amount of research. I guess some people were offended by the hubris and audacious statements made within the article. In addition, a misquotation of the person that was interviewed.
hope this clears some stuff up.
sincerely, some dude.
“Greek Guy”‘s post should be the article instead of this biased and irrelevant gossip.
The University of Toronto Fraternities and Sororities (Yeah, those “St. George” ones) are always doing philanthropy events looking for media coverage to help the cause whether it be big events at large venues that earn thousands of dollars, or just tonight when AOPi had their apple pie night and donated the money to the arthritis foundation.
The point being is there is always positivity being poured into the community by all the members of the “greek life”. And the houses that are 1 minute walks away from UTSG campus, that have been there for over 50 years, that have been having annual parties for the university students for those 50 years, and are located literally beside The Maddy, one of the most popular bars in Toronto that has drunken people stumbling in and out of it until 3am every night, are still the same houses that run 3 times as many study nights and philanthropy events as they have parties, they teach university students how to work as a group and efficiently execute massive events, and most importantly they promote a type of unity that the University of Toronto DOES NOT HAVE ANYWHERE ELSE.
With all that said, it’s still article after article reenforcing the “bad rep” and ignoring the unparalleled positivity and ambition.
This is such a poorly researched article, it takes hear-say and fails to actually conduct any fact checking. “Xi Alpha Pi, founded in 2008, is the first ever multicultural fraternity solely based in Canada.” I can list many multicultural fraternities, but if the purpose of this statement was to claim they were the first in 2008 to set up a multicultural, Canadian fraternity then this article is equally as wrong. Phi Kappa Pi, was established in 1913 and has many Canadian Chapters.
I hope that the underground doesn’t assign tasks, as that is commonly thought of as hazing.
This statement “As far as funding goes, because many sororities and fraternities do discriminate, the University of Toronto does not allocate funding to them.” is also categorically false and simple research would explain that never has the university allocated funding and they never will. These are external organizations and as such they cannot be funded with student money. In my experience, visiting many chapters in both the US and Canada, none of the chapters receive or have asked for university funding.
“If there are any differences between the Scarborough houses and their St. George counterparts, it’s the emphasis on multiculturalism and no hazing.” once again I ask for support of this statement. Seeming this is not an Op-ed or opinion piece, you must have some sort of claim that the St. George houses are bigots who haze. The author points out that there is no hazing in their one example downtown and then claims they are lying.
I don’t want to be all that negative. I understand student journalism is hard, I have written things and have ticked off a lot of people in my time. I understand the frustration of it all. I would however suggest a follow-up piece, or a discussion in the letter to the editors. I want to thank the author though, there is a reason why Greek Life is not discussed much and you shine a bright light on it. There are many misconceptions and ideas that are out there about Greek life, and I think that you have proven that. I think that this would be a great opportunity for the community to come out and show what it all actually means. The point of student media is to create discussion and this certainly has. I apologize if they begining of this response seems cynical or bitter, but after fighting for 4 years to avoid these sorts of uninformed statements, my gears are grinding down.
Thank you Sadaf for starting the conversation.
It’s funny how the frat mentioned say they are different from other fraternities because they don’t party, do drugs, or get drunk, as stated here:
“We don’t call ourselves a ‘frat’, or refer to each other as ‘bro’s’ — we’re brothers. We’re men coming together to enlighten other people. We’re not childish boys who come together to party, do drugs and get drunk. That’s not our intent, that’s not our goal,” said Adil Kanji, XAP’s PR manager.
But their facebook link here shows members of both the sorority and fraternity at the bottom partying with alcohol and who knows what else
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.399215407368.168917.181686227368&type=3
The bottom line is this sorority and fraternity are no different than the ones at st.george, other than they are in scarborough, but with such righteous sounding people in this article, who really would want to join this sorority/fraternity after all?
Not me!
I think the article reflects what students think of utsc’s fraternities/sororities and it’s not Sadaf’s fault if she’s presenting the general view and she clarified as well as she could. Any coverage for utsc greek life is good and I don’t see people are rushing to join.
Savie:
“I think the article reflects what students think of utsc’s fraternities/sororities”
You can’t really claim this article as a reflection of students’ general view when the the editors claim this article is supposed to be “clarifying misconceptions about #UofT sororities and fraternities!”
“it’s not Sadaf’s fault if she’s presenting the general view and she clarified as well as she could.”
It is her fault. She’s not supposed to be presenting the general view of students. The whole point is for her to do her research and present her research. As people already mentioned, she either did minimal research or did a horrible job of it.
Instead, this whole article turned into a XAP and CSX ad. To that, the underground should be ashamed of. Credible journalism does not publish things that are promotional in nature. And if you tell us this article is not promotional at all, you’re going to have to take of your rose coloured glasses. You’re not fooling anyone.
Your best course of action is to do a follow up piece as Buck suggested above.
first of all, pardon my grammar and lack of formal writing in this message. i am so angry at this article that i actually dont even care if this sounds intelligent or not. there is so many things wrong with this article. first of all, fraternties and sororities have been around from the 1700′s? just the fact that you started your article with a poorly reasearched statement made me want to stop reading. most international greek organizations have only been around since the mid to late 1800′s. we dont haze, otherwise our chapters would get shut down. and we are very multicultural and accept anyone of any ethnicity, race, religion etc from any of the three uoft campuses. we dont get funding from the school because yes we are an external organization, but did you ever think we maybe dont even want the schools money? were independant and capable of paying our own way to over 100 years of success at uoft. as for our “traditions” and “rituals”, theyre a positive thing, just as any traditions you have at home with your family. finally, i am not a pi beta phi but im beyond offended you called them out. all our houses have strict media policies that dont allow us to speak to just anyone regarding our respective houses. its not about elitism, its about articles like this always bashing us. i have yet to meet a local fraternity or sorority (in toronto and other university towns too) with a good reputation but you dont see the internationally recognized greek houses writing about that, do you? mind your own business.
Being a brother of Delta Upsilon, a fraternity founded on the principals of anti-secrecy, anti-hazing, and anti-discrimination, I’m disappointed that you blatantly label all groups existing on U of T campuses to uphold these stereotypes.
The lack of research is appalling. If you would’ve taken any time to research the organizations, you would’ve found that DU has no secrets and that everything, right down to pledging and initiation, are open to the public online.
I might be from a different chapter than one you covered, but I’m from an American chapter. I assure you, I was not hazed and I will not haze. My college and state have such a high standard of what is considered hazing that it’s impossible to do so, even if my group supported that.
In your favor, greek life has existed since the late 1700s, but didn’t get a formal organization system until the early to mid 1800s.
Dues in most organizations pay for more than just house upkeep and activities in most cases. Most dues have built in insurance, finance charges, and other fees not attached to social functions. Small colleges like mine don’t even have a greek housing system. If the members can’t afford dues right away or even at all, most groups have a payment plan or an alumni-funded scholarship.
I understand that this is a student article, but even students know that making claims in a controversial subject should be based on facts and not opinions. Also, I’m using this article as a discussion point with my fraternity to discuss what we are trying not to appear to be. Needless to say, your article and the comments above drove the point home. So in that respect, thank you for making an opinion